. Actually, though, who does like being called 'bro'?For the record, I don't like being called 'sweetheart' or 'babe' or 'doll' either.
I don't mind deviating from the topic a bit. I actually had something sort of related, regarding books and marketing, that's been on my mind for a couple of weeks now.
Liar
If you don't feel like reading the link (which is long, and may lead to more clicking), the breakdown is that a publishing company released a book with a black female protagonist, and put a white girl on the cover. This is apparently not unusual. I believe there is a version of Orson Scott Card's Magic Street that suffered the same whitewashing.
I don't want to repeat the article - I don't think I have to explain why this is sofa king wrongheaded. But what I've been rolling around in my brain is this idea of artistic integrity. And it sort of ties in with everything we've been talking about.
So - the first thing any writer, or anyone in the industry, says when people complain about the book cover is "Writers have no control over covers." Okay. I...don't know that I believe that. They have choices. They can choose not to work for publishers that do not allow creative freedom and are willing to piss all over your efforts at the 11th hour. Surely there is a way to research these things. And if all else fails, you can fight. You can pull your book. You can throw a fit.
The thing is, the statement 'writers have no control over their covers' is often followed by 'it's lucky I have an awesome publisher who lets me have my say' or something to that effect. What's really going on here? Kind of sounds to me like selling out, and I do hold the writers partially responsible.
But maybe I'm being unfair. Not everyone can be a starving artist, clinging to their ideals and not much else. Thoughts?